Two-factor authentication (2FA) has transformed from a recommended security measure to an essential defense mechanism for businesses across all sectors. No longer just an optional enhancement, 2FA is a critical component in a company’s cybersecurity arsenal, significantly mitigating the risk of data breaches and unauthorized access.
As cyber threats continue to evolve, integrating 2FA into a comprehensive security strategy has become imperative to protect sensitive information and maintain trust in technological systems. This article explores the key role of 2FA in bolstering cybersecurity defenses, guided by insights from industry leaders and standard-setting bodies like the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST).
Quick Takeaways
- Implementing two-factor authentication (2FA) is crucial for enhancing security and mitigating the risk of unauthorized access and data breaches.
- Major technology companies and standards bodies like NIST endorse 2FA, emphasizing its importance and effectiveness in protecting sensitive data.
- Successfully implementing 2FA requires balancing robust security measures with user convenience to ensure widespread adoption and compliance.
- The investment in 2FA is justified by the significant reduction in the risk and cost associated with data breaches, providing a favorable return on investment.
Compromised Passwords Are the Leading Reason for Hacking-Related Breaches
According to a recent report, 85% of breaches involved a human element, and 61% of those were credential-related.
What this confirms is that, unfortunately, users are the weakest link. You can deploy the most sophisticated layers of data security, encryption, enterprise-grade firewalls, and more. Still, they won’t stop hackers from gaining access to credentials.
By establishing a 2FA protocol, users need more than passwords to access applications. And you’ll need more than password guidelines that require “strong” ones to fortify your network against credential breaches.
NIST Digital Identity Guidelines Regarding 2FA
NIST password guidelines are for federal agencies. Private businesses can look to them as well as the gold standard. NIST recently revised its Digital Identity Guidelines, and they are worth reviewing. The recommendations outline what authorization details a user should present for access.
The revised guidelines speak to all aspects of a digital identity, including identity proofing. Digital authentication establishes that someone attempting to access an application or device is authorized. The NIST guidelines now include the requirement of multi-factor authentication regarding securing any personal information available online.
To meet these guidelines, a user must demonstrate at least two of the following:
- Something you know (i.e., password)
- Something you have (i.e., device)
- Something you are (i.e., fingerprint)
NIST Guidelines Include New Updates to What’s an Acceptable Authorization Channel
The NIST guidelines, however, don’t specifically outline what is a valid form of authentication. It does, however, offer some insight into what’s no longer acceptable. For example, the guidelines now consider email as an unacceptable channel. VoIP (Voice over Internet Protocol) already had this designation.
The reasoning behind this is that NIST identifies these as not OOB (out-of-band) authenticators. That means that NIST doesn’t consider them “separate channels” because they don’t absolutely prove that the user has possession of a device.
So, what other channels are there to consider? SMS has been a popular option for secondary authentication (i.e., you receive a code on your mobile phone and enter it into the system). SMS is not fully on the non-OOB list. Instead, they say it “may not meet OOB requirements.”
This caused an uproar in the security community, and NIST actually clarified its position on SMS. Nonetheless, SMS authentication isn’t foolproof. SMS channels are at risk for attack, and message forwarding is another possible weakness.
NIST understands the concerns here and recommends that a user’s phone number be associated with a specific physical device in the case of using SMS as an authenticator.
Technology Leaders Require 2FA
Most organizations use Microsoft and Google applications. You likely have private, proprietary, and sensitive information in these. Both Microsoft and Google require multi-factor authentication (MFA) for those reasons.
In response to physical data breaches, Microsoft now enforces multi-factor authentication for all users. This mandate was long overdue and provides another layer of access control.
Google also requires a two-step verification to confirm the identity of the user. The company added security keys directly into Android devices so that these phones could function as a secondary form of authentication. They made this announcement on World Password Day, acknowledging that weak passwords and the use of the same ones across applications creates greater vulnerabilities.
Now that these industry leaders mandate the use of MFA, most other SaaS (Software as a Service) models followed the lead. For Intermedia products, we require 2FA and support the following options:
- Intermedia VeriKey app: These are push notifications via iOS and Android smartphone apps.
- SMS text message
- Voice call
- Intermedia VeriKey (one-time passcode)
- Google Authenticator (one-time passcode)
Depending on the business’s profile and nature of access, they can choose from these OOB authenticators.
With this additional layer of security, our users can be confident that our cloud-based communication platforms have the most robust access controls to minimize threats of a breach.
Balancing User Convenience with Security in 2FA
While the primary goal of two-factor authentication (2FA) is to enhance security, achieving the right balance between security measures and user convenience is crucial. This equilibrium ensures that security protocols do not become a barrier to user engagement.
As businesses deploy 2FA, they must consider not only the added security but also how these measures affect the everyday experience of legitimate users.
Implementing User-Friendly Security Measures
Effective 2FA systems are designed to be user-friendly while providing robust security. A cumbersome authentication process may lead users to seek shortcuts or avoid using the system altogether, thereby weakening the security posture. To counteract this, it’s essential to implement solutions that are both easy to use and highly secure.
For instance, push notifications for authentication approvals on a smartphone app combine convenience with security by allowing users to verify login attempts with a single tap, without compromising on security protocols.
Choosing the Right Authentication Factors
Moreover, the choice of authentication factors plays a significant role in balancing these aspects. Factors that require minimal user interaction, such as biometrics or hardware tokens, can enhance security without significantly disrupting user workflow.
Biometric authentication, like fingerprint or facial recognition, provides a high level of security and a seamless user experience. Similarly, using physical security keys can offer a more straightforward approach for users as they simply need to plug in the device to gain access.
Cost-Benefit Analysis of Implementing 2FA
Assessing the Costs
Implementing two-factor authentication (2FA) involves certain costs, which can vary based on the chosen method and scale of implementation. These costs include the initial setup, which may involve software or hardware purchases, and ongoing expenses such as maintenance and user training.
For businesses considering a technology upgrade or those without existing infrastructure, the initial investment can be significant. However, these costs must be weighed against the potential financial impacts of not enhancing security measures.
Evaluating the Benefits
The benefits of implementing 2FA extend far beyond just improved security. By significantly reducing the risk of data breaches, which can be financially crippling and damaging to a company’s reputation, 2FA provides a strong layer of protection against the most common form of security threats: compromised credentials.
According to industry reports, the average cost of a data breach can run into millions of dollars, factoring in legal fees, penalties, and lost business. Implementing 2FA can drastically reduce the likelihood of such breaches, making it a wise investment.
Long-Term Savings
Beyond immediate security improvements, 2FA also offers long-term savings by reducing the need for frequent password resets and IT support related to security breaches. These reductions in administrative overhead not only decrease direct costs but also enhance productivity as employees spend less time dealing with security issues and more time on core business activities.
ROI of 2FA
The return on investment (ROI) for 2FA is typically favorable when considering the potential costs associated with security incidents. Businesses that implement robust 2FA measures often see a reduction in the incidence and impact of security breaches, which can otherwise lead to significant financial losses and harm to the company’s brand.
How Secure Are Your Logins?
Enforcing two-factor authentication is a straightforward yet powerful step toward securing your organization’s digital assets against unauthorized access and cyber threats. The adoption of 2FA remains a critical measure to enhance protection and ensure compliance with industry standards. The modest investment in 2FA can yield substantial dividends by safeguarding your business from potentially devastating security breaches.
Explore our comprehensive security solutions and see how integrating two-factor authentication can elevate your organization’s defense mechanisms. Contact us today to learn more or to schedule a demo and start strengthening your security posture.
Alex Smith
Alex Smith is VP of Product Security & Analytics at Intermedia.
April 2, 2025
Explore other posts on these topics:
